|
Register for free and
these ads will go away. |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 12:59 PM
|
#1
|
|
|
Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
Hey guys,
I just purchased a 2003 Honda Accord LX Sedan Automatic and moved to
Colorado Springs.
Loaded down with all of my personal belongings, I got 32mpg during the
770 mile drive from Dallas. This was fine with me.
During the first few weeks that I was here, my driving was evenly split
between city, small highway (55mph) and mountain driving. I averaged
24mpg.
Determined to do better, I committed to keep the TAC under 3,000 for
the entire volume of gas in the newly-filled tank. I just filled it up
last night and did the calculation. 22mpg.
My eyes are crossing...
Almost all of my driving for this past tank has been city driving. I
have not been an A/C fiend, and I shift into Neutral and coast downhill
rather than let the engine do it. I take my time getting places and I
don't jackrabbit starts or stops.
What am I doing wrong? Or does Colorado just suck? Is my expectation
of 25mpg city driving unreasonable?
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 01:30 PM
|
#2
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
Drewaffe wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? Or does Colorado just suck? Is my expectation
> of 25mpg city driving unreasonable?
>
Yes it is, especially considering your altitude and mountainous terrain.
EPA estimates on the V-6 Accord are 21 city, 30 highway. In your
driving conditions, anything over the EPA city number is a good result
for city driving.
John
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 01:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
Drewaffe wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? Or does Colorado just suck? Is my expectation
> of 25mpg city driving unreasonable?
>
Yes it is, especially considering your altitude and mountainous terrain.
EPA estimates on the V-6 Accord are 21 city, 30 highway. In your
driving conditions, anything over the EPA city number is a good result
for city driving.
John
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#4
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
Drewaffe wrote:
<SNIP> I shift into Neutral and coast downhill
> rather than let the engine do it.
----------------------------
It's illegal to shift into neutral when going downhill, in some
juristictions. It's for a couple of good reasons. Don't do it.
'Curly'
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
Drewaffe wrote:
<SNIP> I shift into Neutral and coast downhill
> rather than let the engine do it.
----------------------------
It's illegal to shift into neutral when going downhill, in some
juristictions. It's for a couple of good reasons. Don't do it.
'Curly'
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 03:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:39:33 -0600, "'Curly Q. Links'"
<motsco_@_interbaun.com> wrote:
>
>
>Drewaffe wrote:
><SNIP> I shift into Neutral and coast downhill
>> rather than let the engine do it.
>----------------------------
>
>It's illegal to shift into neutral when going downhill, in some
>juristictions. It's for a couple of good reasons. Don't do it.
And prey tell what ARE those reasons.
>
>'Curly'
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 03:06 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:39:33 -0600, "'Curly Q. Links'"
<motsco_@_interbaun.com> wrote:
>
>
>Drewaffe wrote:
><SNIP> I shift into Neutral and coast downhill
>> rather than let the engine do it.
>----------------------------
>
>It's illegal to shift into neutral when going downhill, in some
>juristictions. It's for a couple of good reasons. Don't do it.
And prey tell what ARE those reasons.
>
>'Curly'
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 03:14 PM
|
#8
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
oh yeah, because you can easily ram into someones ass. :P
Wow, altitude and mountainous terrain affects gas mileage? very
interesting. Who says you don't learn something new everyday?
Thanks for the info
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 03:14 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
oh yeah, because you can easily ram into someones ass. :P
Wow, altitude and mountainous terrain affects gas mileage? very
interesting. Who says you don't learn something new everyday?
Thanks for the info
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2005, 03:56 PM
|
#10
|
|
|
Re: Terrible Fuel-Efficiency - 2003 Accord
"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote
> Drewaffe wrote:
>
> > What am I doing wrong? Or does Colorado just suck? Is my expectation
> > of 25mpg city driving unreasonable?
> >
>
> Yes it is, especially considering your altitude and mountainous terrain.
The altitude should not affect mileage. (Empirical evidence of this is my 91
Civic: Got 40 mpg at sea level for several months. Still getting 40 mpg at a
mile high altitude, late spring through fall.)
Driving in mountainous terrain may be the problem.
The car is two years old, though. It is about due for a tuneup. Have you had
one done recently? Check your owner's manual. It may specify new
fuel filter
air filter
plugs
at a minimum.
> EPA estimates on the V-6 Accord are 21 city, 30 highway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|